Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Seabrook

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2012No. 2011-2049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Eric Maurice Seabrook of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0069118, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998. Seabrook’s license to practice law was suspended from December 2, 2005, through March 1, 2006, for his failure to comply with the attorney-registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI. In re Attorney Registration Suspension of Seabrook, 107 Ohio St.3d 1431, 2005-Ohio-6408, 838 N.E.2d 671; In re Seabrook, 108 Ohio St.3d 1491, 2006-Ohio-1050, 843 N.E.2d 796. We imposed a second registration suspension on November 3, 2009, and Seabrook’s license was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. HigginsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. TrollerOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cincinnati Bar Association v. Weber.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API