Legal Opinion

Ross v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 2007No. A110543PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

George W. Ross, Jr., sued the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and for age and disability discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12940 et seq.). He appeals from a summary judgment in favor of BART, asserting that there are triable issues of material fact with regard to each of his causes of action. We find that summary judgment was properly granted and affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

After 26 years of employment with BART, Ross retired from his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philip Lawrence v. Turner's Outdoorsman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API