Legal Opinion

Blum v. Blum

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 5, 1983No. [No. 173, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

This case presents the question whether exemptions from attachment provided by Maryland Code (1975, 1982 Cum. Supp.) § 15-601.1 of the Commercial Law Article apply to a wage lien for contractual spousal support ordered pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1981 Repl.Vol., 1982 Cum.Supp.), Art. 16, § 5B (b) (1). More particularly, the question is whether the trial court erred in ordering a wage lien in an amount in excess of 25 percent of the wages due.

Article 16, § 5B (b) (1) 1 provides in pertinent part:

"(b) ... (1) If a court has ordered a person to pay for the support of a spouse or dependent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Mauzy v. HornbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Speckler v. SpecklerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. State v. Intercontinental, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. In Re Arnold M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API