Legal Opinion

Sites v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 12, 1984No. 148, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The primary issue in this case is whether a person apprehended for driving while intoxicated has a statutory or constitutional right to consult counsel before deciding whether to submit to a chemical sobriety test.

I

The record establishes that Jacob Edward Sites was stopped for drunk driving at approximately 12:45 a.m. on May 15, 1982. At 12:55 a.m., while still at the scene, the arresting officer read Sites a standardized statement of his rights and the penalties for refusal to submit to a chemical test under the State’s implied consent statute, Maryland Code (1984…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API