Legal Opinion
State v. Intercontinental, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 9, 1985No. 63, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The issue in this case is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1984 Cum.Supp.), Article 27, § 551(a) authorizes a Maryland judge to issue a warrant to search for and seize evidence which, although located within the judge’s territorial jurisdiction, pertains to violations of another state’s penal laws. Section 551(a) provides in pertinent part:
“Whenever it be made to appear to any judge of any of the circuit courts in the counties of this State, or to any judge of the District Court, by written application signed and sworn to by the applicant, accompanied by an…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Hornbeck v. Somerset County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Blandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Birchead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.