Legal Opinion

In Re Arnold M.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1984No. 96, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case presents a narrow question of statutory interpretation, namely, whether Maryland Code (1980, 1983 Cum.Supp.), § 3-829 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, authorizes a juvenile court to order the State to pay restitution to a victim of a delinquent act committed by a juvenile while in the lawful custody of the State. In pertinent part, § 3-829 provides that the court may

“enter a judgment of restitution against the parent of a child, or the child in any case in which the court finds a child has committed a delinquent act . . . . ” (Emphasis supplied.)(1)

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hornbeck v. Somerset County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. State v. BrickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API