Legal Opinion

Bordman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 16, 2001No. 14-98-01374-CR-14-98-01376-CRPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAURICE E. AMIDEI, Justice (Assigned).

Carl Bordman appeals his jury convictions for aggravated sexual assault of his three children. The jury assessed his punishment at 75 years’ imprisonment in each case. The trial court ordered the three sentences to run concurrently. In five points of error, appellant contends: (1) & (2) the trial court erred by denying appellant’s motion to suppress his confession; (3) the trial court erred by refusing to grant his motion for an instructed verdict; (4) appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (5) the trial court erred by not…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  3. Bollinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  4. Rogers v. Department of Family & Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API