Legal Opinion

Davis v. Starkenburg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1940No. 27958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was commenced by Joseph T. Pemberton, as guardian ad litem of Swan Finney, an incompetent person, against Jake Pieter Starkenburg, Peter J. Starkenburg and Jane Doe Starkenburg, his wife, Fred L. Schaefer and Johanna Schaefer, his wife, to quiet title in plaintiff to eighty acres of land in What-com county.

On March 23, 1939, it appearing to the court that Swan Finney had died since this action was commenced, Edith Mary Davis, administratrix of the estate of Swan Finney, deceased, and Ellen Finney and Edith Mary Davis, as real parties in interest and as heirs of Swan Finney,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fresno Estate Co. v. FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Currier v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Cheney Electric Light, Telephone & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Witte v. Old Nat. Bank of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Adc Venture 2011-2, Llc v. Mtb Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Adrien Petersen v. Robert K. Mccormic, JrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Sanchez v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API