California Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Cheney Electric Light, Telephone & Power Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, Spokane County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gordon, J.
The record in this case presents but a single 'question for our determination, viz., can a claim of prior and paramount, adverse title be litigated in a foreclosure suit. We think the question must be answered in the negative.
*139The rule is laid down in 2 Jones, Mortgages, § 1589, as follows:
“ Only the rights and interests under the mortgage and subsequent to it can properly be litigated upon a bill of foreclosure. One claiming adversely to the title of the mortgagor cannot be made a party to the suit for the purpose of trying his adverse claim.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dial v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Merchants' Bank v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Banning v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n v. SaundersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Johnson v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Bollen v. Wilson Creek Union Grain & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Grosscup v. German Savings & Loan SocietyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.