Hargrave v. Cook
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Ventura County granting a new trial. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from the order granting a new trial.
Plaintiffs claim ownership in common with some of the named defendants in a certain described ditch, flume, water right, and right of way, by means of which they diverted the waters of Piru river to their non-riparian lands. The ditch was known as the Hargrave & Comfort ditch. They averred the adverse claims of defendants and asked for a decree settling their rights and enjoining defendants from further assertion of such or any claims.
The defendants answered in accordance with their various claims; some asserting ownership in the ditch and water…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Davis v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.