Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 13, 1987No. 86SA150PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MULLARKEY, Justice.

This case involves the defendant’s speedy trial rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), section 24-60-501, 10 C.R.S. (1982). The district court dismissed four criminal charges against the defendant, Gordon H. Allen, because of the People’s failure to bring the defendant to trial within 120 days of his arrival in Colorado as required by IAD Article IV(c). The People filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. The People now ap*74peal1 from the order denying reconsideration. We affirm.

I

A brief explanation of the IAD speedy trial requirements is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. MoodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. People v. MascarenasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. United States v. Leroy EaddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  4. Finney v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API