Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Camp
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The essential question for decision is whether the complainant-mortgagee-purchaser of mortgaged lands at a judicial foreclosure sale and his grantee in possession, under a deed of general warranty, may have strict foreclosure against a junior mortgagee not made a party to the foreclosure proceedings, due to the non-disclosure of the latter's recorded assignment of the mortgage on the title search made on complainant's behalf for the purpose of discovering — preparatory to the foreclosure — the interests to be barred. Concededly, complainant did not possess actual knowledge of the identity of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- J. W. Pierson Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Gregorio Lajara (073511)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.