Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Camp

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 16, 1938PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The essential question for decision is whether the complainant-mortgagee-purchaser of mortgaged lands at a judicial foreclosure sale and his grantee in possession, under a deed of general warranty, may have strict foreclosure against a junior mortgagee not made a party to the foreclosure proceedings, due to the non-disclosure of the latter's recorded assignment of the mortgage on the title search made on complainant's behalf for the purpose of discovering — preparatory to the foreclosure — the interests to be barred. Concededly, complainant did not possess actual knowledge of the identity of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  3. Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  4. J. W. Pierson Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Perkins v. Trinity Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Gregorio Lajara (073511)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  5. Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API