Legal Opinion
Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 9, 1936No. Nos. 716 and 895, 893 and 785PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
Hearing on issues raised by a special defense in answers to original bills in the nature of supplemental bills.
These supplemental bills aver that on January 14, 1936, plaintiff had “assigned its entire right, title and interest in and to the aforesaid invention and improvement, and in and to said letters patent” to Uni*847versal Oil Products Company, a Delaware corporation, and prayed that the assignee be substituted “as plaintiff in place, and instead, of its assignor, Universal Oil Products Company, a Corporation of South Dakota,” plaintiff in these suits. Answers filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Ormond v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
- National Cash Register Co. v. New Columbus Watch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Standard Oil Co. v. MarkhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
- Standard Oil Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947