Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Markham

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 7, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

I

In this action under § 9 (a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 9 (a), plaintiffs seek to recover from the Alien Property Custodian (1) many hundreds of patents relating principally to the Hydrocarbon Field, herein called Class A S.I.G. patents, (2) many hundreds of patents useful in the Hydrocarbon Field, herein called Class B S.I.G. patents, (3) many Jasco patents for processes relating to Acetylene Arc, Paraffin Oxidation, Oppanol and Buna, (4) 200 shares of S.I.G. stock, (5) 5 shares of Jas-co stock and (6) 425 shares of USAC stock.

The 91…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Kind v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Bradford v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Miyuki Okihara v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
  5. Clayton v. FarishNew York Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API