Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Corporation v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys often give high rhetorical praise to the function of a jury under the common law system — and then, when it suits their clients’ purposes, in order to defeat an adversary’s demand for a jury trial they invoke “Governmental immunity”, “lack of statutory right”, “inappropriateness”, etc.
In the instant case, we do not propose to lend ourselves to any such ambivaluation of that potent instrument of Anglo-American law.
Nor will the fact that we are urged to do so by counsel for a Government-owned corporation cause us to overlook the historic and traditional purposes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. WaymireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Lowell G. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Mildred S. Curry v. Pyramid Life Insurance Company and Home Savings Association of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Jamaica Lodge 2188 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- Randolph C. Bentler v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.