Legal Opinion

National City Bank of NY v. Republic of China

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1955No. 30PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

The Shanghai-Nanking Railway Administration, an official agency of respondent Republic of China, established a $200,000 deposit account in 1948 with the New York head office of petitioner National City Bank of New York. Subsequently, respondent sought to withdraw the funds, but petitioner refused to pay, and respondent brought suit in Federal District Court under 48 Stat. 184, as amended, 12 U. S. C. § 632.

In addition to various defenses, petitioner interposed two counterclaims seeking an affirmative judgment for $1,634,432 on defaulted Treasury Notes of respondent owned by petitioner.1 After…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Republic of Austria v. AltmannSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API