Legal Opinion

United States v. Pfitsch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1921No. 246PublishedCited by 99 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Error to review a judgment of the District Court in an. action under § 10 of the Lever Act. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the court.

Pursuant'to § 10, of the Lever Act (August 10, 1917, c. 53, 40 Stat. 276, 279) the President requisitioned for the A,rmy on April 18, 1918, á radial drill belonging to Pfitsch. The Board of Appraisers of the War Department found its then value to be $3,979.50, and awarded hint' that amount as cdmpensation. Pfitsch declared this amount was unsatisfactory and insisted that the value was greater and that he was entitled also to interest from the date of the taking. On February 5, 1919, the Government paid him an amount equal to 75 per centum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. J. Homer Fritch, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API