Legal Opinion

Genova v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1973No. 25947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Judge.

Upon the theory of nuisance, plaintiff recovered a judgment pursuant to the verdict of a jury against defendant in the amount of $3,640.00 for water damage to plaintiff’s building at 2826, 2828 and 2830 McGee Trafficway, in Kansas City, Missouri.

Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal upon the ground that its statement of facts is not fair and concise as required by Rule 84.04(c), V.A. M.R.: “The statement of facts shall be a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for determination without argument. Such statement of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Harry and Florence Kelley v. Natl. Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Corrington v. KalicakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Jurgeson v. RomineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API