Genova v. City of Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Judge.
Upon the theory of nuisance, plaintiff recovered a judgment pursuant to the verdict of a jury against defendant in the amount of $3,640.00 for water damage to plaintiff’s building at 2826, 2828 and 2830 McGee Trafficway, in Kansas City, Missouri.
Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal upon the ground that its statement of facts is not fair and concise as required by Rule 84.04(c), V.A. M.R.: “The statement of facts shall be a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for determination without argument. Such statement of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Harry and Florence Kelley v. Natl. Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
- Corrington v. KalicakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jurgeson v. RomineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983