Legal Opinion

Looney v. Hindman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 26, 1983No. 64078Published

1Opinion of the Court

649 S.W.2d 207 (1983)

David F. LOONEY and Mildred D. Looney, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

James C. HINDMAN and Betty M. Hindman, his wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 64078.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

March 29, 1983.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 26, 1983.

Ernest L. Keathley, Jr., St. Louis, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen M. Glassman, William B. England, St. Louis, for defendants-respondents.

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The plaintiffs own a home in Bridgeton, St. Louis County. The defendants' home adjoins the plaintiffs' on the south. A fence along the south border of the plaintiffs'…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Welliver; Concurrence · Higgins; Per curiam.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API