Walker v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The amended bill rests upon the theory that defendant’s property and rights under the contract conveyance made an exhibit thereto have been forfeited by a violation of the provisions of paragraph 3 of the “conditions and limitations” appearing in said instrument, and its cancellation and annulment is prayed. Clauses of this character have been considered as intended for the protection and preservation to the estate of the future growth of the timber, and construed as having reference to the beginning by the purchaser of a substantial cutting of the timber, as distinguished from a mere “casual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Libby v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Seaboard A. L. Ry. Co. v. Anniston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Murphy v. Schuster Springs Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nettles v. LichtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- NCNB Texas Nat. Bank, NA v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Hart v. Baptist Foundation of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Smith v. DukeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.