Legal Opinion

Nettles v. Lichtman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1934No. 2 Div. 37PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

This appeal turns upon the proper construction of the deed (Exhibit A to the bill) executed by Charles Lichtman and wife to Black Warrior Lumber Company in February, 1919, the salient features of which appear in the report of thi* case. The description of the property conveyed as found in the granting clause is: “All the trees and timber now standing, lying or being or which within a period of twenty (20) years from the date of this instrument, may grow upon the following described lands.”

In recent years paper mills have been established in this state (the first, as alleged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Dickson v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Jasper Land Co. v. Manchester SawmillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Wright v. Bentley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Sellers v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Goode v. TylerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Holt v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Brashier v. BurkettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API