Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Schuster Springs Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 18, 1926No. 3 Div. 778PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The litigation herein arises between the vendor and the purchaser of standing timber, and turns upon the proper construction of the italicized portions of this paragraph of the written contract of sale:
“Said timber to be cut and removed from said lands within five years from the date of this conveyance, with the option and privilege of extending this eontraot for not exceeding three years from, the expiration hereof on lands upon which timber has not been cut, by the payment to the undersigned grantors, by the W. T. Smith Lumber Company, the sum of fifty cents per acre per year for the time…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dyer v. DuffyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Bateman v. Kramer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Heflin v. BinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. v. Nelson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Walker v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- COLONIAL BAKING CO. OF ALA. v. Pine Dale, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Rudder v. TriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.