Legal Opinion

Libby v. Winston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1922No. 7 Div. 226PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

The rule — stated in Hill v. Gray, 160 Ala. 273, 276, 49 South. 676, and in Graves v. Wheeler, 180 Ala. 412, 416, 61 South. 341 — which pronounces void clauses in deeds or devises in absolute, not partial, restraint of the power of alienation of land conveyed or devised, is predicated of a grant or devise in fee simple. The essence of the stated rule is that the attempted restraint upon the power of alienation is inconsistent with the grant, the power to sell or lease being an inseparable incident of an estate in unqualified fee; and to allow such restraint would . offend public…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hopkins v. GrimshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Graves v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Austin v. PeppermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Sinclair Refining Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API