Legal Opinion

Vanderwerker v. City of Superior

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The ordinance which it is admitted the defendants purposed to enforce would materially impair the rights of plaintiffs to operate as a common carrier upon certain of the streets of the city of Superior and would require the furnishing of a surety bond in double the amount as well as for an additional liability over that required under the state law. The designation by the railroad commission of the streets and public highways oyer which it deems that such service is reasonably required for the accommodation of the public is beyond question a substantial element in its consent and permission…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Jitney Bus Ass'n of Wilkes-Barre v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Ekern v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Safe Way Motor Coach Co. v. City of Two RiversWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Thomson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. City of Milwaukee v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API