In re the Estate of Borax
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Samuel J. Silverman, S.
A question as to the applicability of SCPA 315, the virtual representation statute, is presented. The question is whether in this accounting proceeding decedent’s son James may be said virtually to represent his infant son, decedent’s grandson, Hugh, so as to avoid the necessity to make the infant a party or appoint a guardian for him.
The most difficult question arises under Article Eighth of the will which for present purposes directs that one half of the residuary estate shall be held in trust for testator’s son James until he shall reach the age of 35, with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of FullerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of LeyshonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of PutignanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of SilverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Estate of SchwartzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
- In re the Estate of AdlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.