In re the Estate of Putignano
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nathan R. Sobel, S.
Incidental to the settlement of the executors’ account, advice and direction is requested of the court whether specified remaindermen and contingent remaindermen are virtually represented by others who have been made parties to the proceeding. (SCPA 315.)
Virtual representation made applicable to proceedings in the Surrogates’ Courts upon recommendation of the Bennett Commission on Estates (Third Report, 1964, pp 276-297) is a doctrine which permits one who is a party (the "representor”) to represent in a particular proceeding persons or a class of persons ("representees”)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Accounting of BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- In re the Estate of BoraxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- In re the Estate of FullerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- In re the Estate of LeyshonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of SilverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morrow v. Vineville United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In re the Estate of LevyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1985
- In re the Estate of SandersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
- In re the Estate of GinsburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982
- In re the Estate of DickeyNew York Surrogate's Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.