Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Adler

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 27, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard L. Midonick, S.

In this proceeding by the executor to determine the validity of an election made by one claiming to be the lawful widow of the decedent, petitioner asserts that under SOPA 315 it is unnecessary to cite infant contingent remaindermen of the trusts. The will creates two separate trusts for decedent’s two children, the son’s to continue until he attains the age of 35 years and the daughter’s until age 40. Each child receives the income of the separate trust until the specified age is reached, at which time the principal is to be paid to him or her. There is authority in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BoraxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
  2. In re the Estate of FullerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  3. In re the Estate of TriggerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re GoldstickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of PutignanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. In re the Estate of SandersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  4. In re SchlesingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
  5. In re the Estate of SandefurNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API