Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schwartz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 17, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

In this executors’ accounting proceeding, a question has arisen as to whether the virtual representation statute (SCPA 315) applies to the facts presented hy this estate.

Testator’s will establishes a residuary “sprinkling” trust for the benefit of the widow, a daughter, and any one or more of the daughter’s issue. There is presently one granddaughter, who, it is contended, need not be cited by reason of the virtual representation statute. Upon the death of the widow, if the daughter is still living, the ‘ ‘ sprinkling ’ ’ trust is to continue for the daughter and her issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of BoraxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
  3. In re the Estate of FullerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  4. In re the Estate of LeyshonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
  5. In re the Estate of SnyderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re de SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Estate of HollandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  3. In re the Estate of PutignanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  4. In re the Estate of SilverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  5. In re the Estate of SandersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API