Legal Opinion

Scallon v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010SC270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

We shall consider plaintiffs assignments of error concerning the trial court’s instructions first. The two basic issues are whether plaintiff was entitled to an instruction on G.S. 20-71.1 and whether a peremptory instruction was properly given in favor of defendant Charles Caldwell. We conclude that the trial court committed error in both regards and order a new trial on the agency issue.

It cannot be questioned that G.S. 20-71.1 was applicable to this case. As explained by the Court in Duckworth v. Metcalf, the statute essentially provides that:

[p]roof of ownership of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Duckworth v. MetcalfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Chappell v. DeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Three Guys Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Winston v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Norman v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API