Legal Opinion

Norman v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1980No. 8026DC500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

On a motion for directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence in a jury case, the evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. The motion may be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. All the evidence which tends to *663support plaintiffs claim must be taken as true and viewed in the light most favorable to it, giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn therefrom. Home Products Corp. v. Motor Freight, Inc., 46 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norman v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API