Legal Opinion

Duckworth v. Metcalf

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1966No. 363PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

There was no error in the denial of the motion by Metcalf for a judgment of nonsuit. Upon such motion, the evidence offered by the plaintiff must be taken to be true and considered in the light most favorable to him and evidence offered by the defendant tending to contradict or rebut the plaintiff’s evidence must be disregarded. Bennett v. Young, 266 N.C. 164, 169, 145 S.E. 2d 853, and cases there cited. So interpreted, the plaintiff’s evidence is sufficient to show that the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries was the act of Courtney in undertaking to pass another vehicle proceeding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Parrott v. . KantorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Parrott v. KantorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. West Ex Rel. West v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wegner v. Delly-Land Delicatessen, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Edwards v. AkionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Paul E. Kline v. Wheels by Kinney, Inc., and Kinney National Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. McNair v. Lend Lease Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API