Legal Opinion

Gray v. Hager

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1984No. 8322DC462PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

The issue is whether a document that specifies a sales price, but states that an interest-bearing note and deed of trust will be executed, and that the terms of payment will be agreed on subsequently, meets the legal requisites of a valid contract. We hold that it does not, and that the court thus erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiffs and denying it to defendants.

II

Plaintiffs and defendants signed a document captioned “deposit receipt and agreement of sale,” which provided that defend ants would purchase plaintiffs’ house for $48,500. Defendants were to make a down…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Burgess v. RodomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Scott v. United Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Person Earth Movers, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Koenig v. Town of Kure BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Ford v. STATE, DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API