Gray v. Hager
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
I
The issue is whether a document that specifies a sales price, but states that an interest-bearing note and deed of trust will be executed, and that the terms of payment will be agreed on subsequently, meets the legal requisites of a valid contract. We hold that it does not, and that the court thus erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiffs and denying it to defendants.
II
Plaintiffs and defendants signed a document captioned “deposit receipt and agreement of sale,” which provided that defend ants would purchase plaintiffs’ house for $48,500. Defendants were to make a down…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Burgess v. RodomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by13 opinions
- MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Scott v. United Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Person Earth Movers, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Koenig v. Town of Kure BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Ford v. STATE, DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.