Legal Opinion

Ford v. STATE, DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1994No. 9330SC989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Plaintiff, a video game distributor, instituted this action seeking injunctive and compensatory relief based upon defendant’s declaration that certain types of video machines violated North Carolina’s criminal gambling laws. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment — thereby dismissing plaintiff’s action. We are not persuaded by plaintiff’s argument and thus affirm the decision of the trial court.

On 1 November 1991, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission (“ABC Commission”) issued a memorandum indicating that in the ABC…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Gray v. HagerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Holly Ridge Associates, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Griffith v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Holly Ridge Associates, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API