Legal Opinion
Tusso v. Smith
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 15, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Marvel, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiffs, who own a home in the vicinity of Adams and Jackson Streets in Wilmington, Delaware, bring this action not only as qualified voters, freeholders and taxpayers but as members of a so-called Taxpayers’ Protective Association made up of residents of the Adams-Jackson Streets area who are opposed to the construction by the State Highway Department of a proposed freeway through that section of the City of Wilmington. They sue on behalf of themselves, “* * * and for other persons similarly situated as taxpayers, freeholders, residents and qualified voters of * *…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Clendaniel v. ConradSupreme Court of Delaware · 1912
- Henderson v. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Rome v. ArcherCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964
- City of Wilmington Ex Rel. Water Department v. LordSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
- Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
- Ullman v. SantowCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960