Legal Opinion

City of Wilmington Ex Rel. Water Department v. Lord

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 28, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HARA, Judge.

This is a condemnation action brought by the City of Wilmington in an effort to acquire a site on the Greenhill Golf Course for the construction of a 500,000 gallon elevated water tank. The question before the Court is whether the City of Wilmington acting through its water department may, as a home rule city, condemn certain rights in parkland now held in trust. This Court has previously ruled that a municipality may not exercise the power of eminent domain over property already devoted to a public use unless the legislature has authorized the acquisition either…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Riley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Piekarski v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Ouachita Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HoesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  2. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. City of SeafordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. Schadt v. LatchfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. Powell v. Washington Land Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Powell v. Washington Land Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API