Ullman v. Santow
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Marvel, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiffs, who are owners of homes in Mill Creek Hundred, live in the same zoning district in which the lot in controversy in this case is located. Prior to June 26, 1956, such lot, which is owned by defendants, was zoned R-2 (agricultural and general purpose). On the date indicated, the Levy Court of New Castle County acting “without jurisdiction”, according to plaintiffs, purported to rezone such lot by changing its classification on the official county zoning map to C-2 (roadside business).
Plaintiffs, in their original complaint, which was filed on February 16,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- MacCrone v. American Capital CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Pratt v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Simkin v. ColeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Reinbacher v. ConlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scarborough v. MAYOR & COUN. OF TOWN OF CHESWOLDCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
- Ullman v. SantowCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Nathan v. MartinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974