Calderon v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
We are called upon to decide whether the “one man, one vote” command of the equal protection clause requires that councilmanic voting districts be apportioned according to population or whether it is satisfied if each district contains a substantially equal number of registered voters. In short, is the constitutional imperative fulfilled by a standard of “one voter, one vote,” rather than “one person, one vote”? As we explain infra, we have concluded that an apportionment plan based on registered voters will satisfy the equal protection clause only if it produces districts…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Garza v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Legislature v. ReineckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- The State of Georgia v. The National Democratic PartyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.