Legal Opinion

Legislature v. Reinecke

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1972No. Docket Nos. Sac. 7917, 7919, 7923PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

In these mandate proceedings we are called upon to resolve the impasse created by the failure to date of the Legislature to pass legislative and congressional reapportionment bills acceptable to the Governor in time for the upcoming 1972 primary and general elections. For the reasons hereafter stated we have concluded that there is now no practical alternative available to us but to order into effect readily available temporary apportionment plans for the 1972 elections. As we have repeatedly emphasized in the past, however, reapportionment is primarily a matter for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Graves v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API