Legal Opinion

Burnell v. Roush

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1965No. 3405PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Claiming to be the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest to the oil, gas, and other minerals in the Ei^ of Section 20, Township 43 North, Range 74 West of the 6th Principal Meridian of Campbell County, Wyoming, as a tenant in common, the plaintiff Nova Roush Burnell commenced an action seeking declaratory relief from the adverse claim of the defendant Loretta Roush (hereinafter referred to as defendant) to the property above described. The Texas Company, a corporation, was also named as a party defendant, but its interest, if any, so far as this appeal is concerned is not before us. From…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. DixonWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Naab v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Dame v. MileskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Roush v. RoushWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pine Creek Canal No. 1 v. StadlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Williams v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API