Legal Opinion

Roush v. Roush

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1979No. 4975PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant-plaintiff appeals from the order denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting appellees-defend-ants’ motion for summary judgment. We will affirm.

FACTS

Defendants are the children of Loy Roush and Nova Roush. Loy Roush was owner of the E.Vz of Section 20, T. 43 N., R. 74 W. in Campbell County, Wyoming. On December 30, 1939, the land was conveyed by deed from Loy Roush and Nova Roush to August and Luella Laur. The deed contained an exception whereby one-half of the owned mineral rights was reserved to grantors. On September 15, 1941, Loy Roush and Nova Roush were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bard Ranch Company v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Minnehoma Financial Co. v. PauliWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cook v. ElmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rick Morgan v. City of Rawlins and Abe DeherreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Delgue v. CurutchetWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Rialto Theatre, Inc. v. Commonwealth Theatres, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API