Legal Opinion
Anval Nyby Powder AB v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 21, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-80. Court No. 95-02-00183PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge:
Plaintiff, Anval Nyby Powder AB, invokes this Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1994). 1 The action involves the proper classification of cobalt alloy powders within heading 8105 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). 2 Customs’ classification is before this Court for de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2640(a) (1994) on the summary judgment motions of the plaintiff and the defendant. Upon liquidation the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) classified the cobalt alloy powders as “Unwrought cobalt: Alloys” under subheading…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Amity Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Haggar Apparel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.