Legal Opinion

Erskine v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 24, 2010No. 416, 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this criminal appeal we address the need for a jury instruction on an accomplice’s mental state and culpability for an aggravating factor. It is settled law that a court must give instructions on lesser included offenses only if requested to do so by either party, and only if there is a rational basis in the evidence to acquit the defendant of the charged offense and find the defendant guilty of the lesser one. By statute, an accomplice is criminally liable for an offense only on the basis of the accomplice’s own mental state and accountability for an aggravating factor.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Chance v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Erskine v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API