Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 8, 2010No. 26, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this criminal appeal, we address the question left undecided in Erskine v. State 1 — whether the trial court must give a jury instruction on an accomplice’s level of liability if there is a basis for such an instruction, but neither party requests it. By statute, accomplice liability must be based on the accomplice’s own mental state and accountability for an aggravating factor. Thus, in appropriate circumstances, an accomplice may be found guilty of less serious offenses than the principal defendant. But accomplices do not always ask for an accomplice liability jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Erskine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. State of Delaware v. Joseph DickinsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API