Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 23, 2012No. Nos. 415, 2008, 596, 2010PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

This Court consolidated two appeals concerning accomplice testimony to determine whether a trial judge must give a cautionary instruction on testimony offered by a witness who claims to have been the defendant’s accomplice, even if the defense does not request it, and to determine the appropriate content of an accomplice instruction. We hold that a trial judge who fails to give an instruction about accomplice testimony commits plain error. We further hold that trial judges must give a modified version of the instruction from Bland v. State1 whenever the State offers…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API