Brooks v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice:
This Court consolidated two appeals concerning accomplice testimony to determine whether a trial judge must give a cautionary instruction on testimony offered by a witness who claims to have been the defendant’s accomplice, even if the defense does not request it, and to determine the appropriate content of an accomplice instruction. We hold that a trial judge who fails to give an instruction about accomplice testimony commits plain error. We further hold that trial judges must give a modified version of the instruction from Bland v. State1 whenever the State offers…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.