Legal Opinion

Harper v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 13, 2015No. 453, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEITZ, Justice:

I. INTRODUCTION

A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant, Rondaiges Harper, of carjacking in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree, and two counts of conspiracy in the second degree. On appeal he argues that his convictions should be reversed because the crime of carjacking was completed by the time he joined the two teenagers who had stolen the victim’s car and confined her in the trunk. We conclude, based on the language and legislative history of Delaware’s carjacking statute, that the crime of carjacking is not a continuing crime, but instead is completed at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Benjamin Lloyd HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Figueroa-CartagenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re A.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  2. McMullen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API