Legal Opinion

United States v. Lydia Cooper

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 2006No. 05-1447PublishedCited by 556 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

Defendant Lydia Cooper contends her criminal sentence was unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Cooper also challenges the District Court’s failure to depart downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. At issue is the imposition of criminal sentences post-Booker. We will affirm.

I

On September 2, 2004, Cooper pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to deliver cocaine base (crack) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Cooper had two prior convictions in 1989— conspiracy to deliver .39…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by556 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Sean Michael GrierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. TomkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

551 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API