Legal Opinion
United States v. Marcial-Santiago
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2006No. 05-30248, 05-30249, 05-30251PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Jose Marcial-Santiago, Roberto Acosta-Franco, and Victor Sanchez-Acosta (“Appellants”) appeal the sentences they received upon pleading guilty and being convicted of being illegal aliens found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Appellants were prosecuted and sentenced in the District of Montana, which does not have a fast-track program. They contend that the disparity between their sentences, and the sentences imposed on similarly-situated defendants who are prosecuted in districts with fast-track programs, is unwarranted and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Christopher Ray PlouffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Roseli Banuelos-Rodriguez, Aka: Rogelio Banuelos-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- United States v. Gomez-HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Roberto Aguirre-Villa, A/K/A Jose HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Jorge MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.