Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Pasch

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1943No. 6600PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Thornton, brought this action to recover damages for breach of contract. On the trial at the close of plaintiff’s case, the court took the case from the jury and granted defendants’ motion for a nonsuit on the grounds that there was no evidence that a contract had been entered into and that there was no evidence that plaintiff had sustained damages. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show the following facts: The defendants were in the roofing business, and plaintiff was a trucker. Early in May, 1942, the defendant Pasch asked plaintiff if he would like…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Calo, Inc. v. AMF Pinspotters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. O'HARA v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Terry v. PanekUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Radley v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API