Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brooke
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 11, 2003No. Misc. AG No. 36, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against respondent alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The Commission charged respondent with violating Rules 1.8(c) (Conflict of Interest, Prohibited Transactions),1 5.3(c) (Responsibilities Regarding Non-lawyer Assistants),2 and 8.4 (Misconduct).3 Pursuant to Maryland *162Rule 16-752(a), we referred the matter to Judge Joseph P. McCurdy, Jr., of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.