Continental Machines, Inc. v. Grob
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs began in 1931 to make filing machines which operate much like the old common band saw, except that segments with file surface are attached to a belt and carried continuously around the two vertically spaced pulleys in the place of the old flexible saw blade, and metal work is pressed against the downward moving abrading surface instead of wood. The defendant began manufacturing its continuous filing machines in March, 1935, and the plaintiffs brought a suit for patent infringement. After a trial on the merits, the court decided against the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peters v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Houser v. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co. v. Wilson Jones Loose Leaf Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Stevens v. Rodgers Boiler & Burner Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Koochook Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
- Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957